Goldman Sachs Says Currency Carry Trade Has Staged a Major Comeback
The forex carry trade, blamed for a major 2024 market disruption, has returned to multi-year highs, Goldman Sachs reports.
One of the most controversial strategies in global finance is back in force. The currency carry trade — in which investors borrow cheaply in low-interest-rate currencies and park the proceeds in higher-yielding ones — has rebounded sharply and is now larger than it has been in many years, according to Goldman Sachs. The resurgence is striking given how dramatically the trade unraveled in 2024, when its sudden collapse sent shockwaves through global markets.
The 2024 blowup served as a stark reminder of the hidden leverage embedded in carry strategies. When volatility spikes or interest-rate differentials narrow unexpectedly, carry traders can face rapid, simultaneous unwinding — amplifying losses far beyond what the underlying positions might suggest. That episode rattled hedge funds, equity markets, and currency pairs worldwide, raising serious questions about how much systemic risk the trade carries at scale.
Read more Single-Stock ETFs Are Pushing Leverage to Its Limits →
Yet the same dynamics that make carry trades dangerous also make them persistently attractive. As long as interest-rate differentials between major economies remain wide, the arithmetic of borrowing in a weak-yielding currency and investing in a stronger one continues to generate returns that are hard for institutional investors to ignore. The strategy thrives in low-volatility environments, and its comeback suggests that market participants are once again pricing in relative calm — a bet that could prove fragile if macro conditions shift.
The Goldman Sachs assessment underscores a broader tension in global markets: the appetite for yield is powerful enough to draw investors back into positions that, just months ago, contributed to significant turbulence. Whether this revival represents rational recalibration or the seeds of another disruptive unwind remains an open question — one that central bank policy, geopolitical surprises, or a sudden volatility spike could answer quickly and painfully.
Continue reading at MarketWatch.com
