Claiming Social Security at 70: Is It Right for Couples With Pensions?
A 67-year-old with a $140,000 pension weighs delaying Social Security to 70 to boost survivor benefits for his wife.
For married couples navigating retirement income, few decisions carry more long-term consequence than when to claim Social Security — and the stakes are especially high when one spouse's death would trigger a dramatic drop in household income. That is precisely the dilemma facing a 67-year-old retiree with a $140,000 pension who is weighing whether to delay his Social Security claim until age 70, primarily to protect his wife after he's gone.
The core concern is stark: when this retiree passes, his household retirement income would collapse to just $30,000 a year. That kind of income cliff is a common and underappreciated risk in retirement planning, particularly for couples where one partner holds a substantial pension and the other has limited independent income. Delaying Social Security to 70 increases the monthly benefit by roughly 8% per year beyond full retirement age, and crucially, it also raises the survivor benefit a spouse can claim — potentially a lifeline for a widow or widower facing decades of reduced income.
Read more The Cheaper VGT Alternative Advisors Won't Tell You About →
The calculus here involves more than just break-even math. A higher Social Security benefit claimed at 70 can serve as a form of longevity insurance for the surviving spouse, especially given that women statistically outlive men and may face 20 or more years of retirement on a single income stream. With the pension dropping to $30,000 upon the retiree's death, a maximized Social Security survivor benefit could mean the difference between financial stability and genuine hardship for his wife.
That said, the decision isn't automatic. The retiree's current health, the age gap between spouses, and whether the wife has her own Social Security or income sources all factor into the optimal strategy. A couple in this position would benefit from modeling multiple scenarios, including what the wife's total income looks like under different claiming ages, and whether bridging the gap from 67 to 70 with existing assets is feasible without straining their current lifestyle.
Continue reading at MarketWatch.com
